The race for installation of solar fields hides predatory
Dear Sir,
in the Italian hit by an unprecedented crisis again nostro territorio è al centro d'interessi economici di alcuni privati, in palese conflitto con il bene della collettività intera. Mi riferisco alla triste e anche un po' paradossale vicenda del ricorso al TAR che alcuni ambienti di Confindustria Ascoli avrebbero fatto nei confronti della Regione Marche e della Provincia di Ascoli Piceno.
Aldilà di una certa miopia nella visione strategica di sviluppo per il territorio, la corsa alle installazioni di campi fotovoltaici nasconde comportamenti predatori, che comportano enormi danni all'intera società civile in ambito economico, ambientale e sociale.
Da un punto di vista economico il fotovoltaico, lungi dall'essere una risposta concreta ed efficace ai problemi energetici, rappresenta una true source of speculation for some wealthy investors to the detriment of citizens. You do not need to do long and extensive studies of the bluff to see around what are called "renewable sources", including photovoltaics.
Just read some article
intellectually honest about it or go check the data reported directly from the Manager of Energy Services
(GSE) to become immediately aware that the
photovoltaics, like other sources, is a net loss for the community:
without government incentives they can not recover even partially.
the public subsidy paid by the GSE is about € 440 per MWh and a ground system such
1 MW, in twenty years the GSE investors will transfer about three times the amount of (something like € 6 million for a net gain of 300%!)
The question now arises: If a plant is
so disadvantageous economically speaking, because there is so high
interest in making solar farms? Why is the country that finances them, taking the money on the bill to the consumer. We understand that alternative energies are thus a way of "milking the state" among other things, not making any benefit to the territory (other than the Cassa del Mezzogiorno). We understand that time travel incentives, the use the TAR, the various flags waved in the name of environmentalism by certain organizations.
In an illuminating article recently appeared on the site VOCE.INFO,
George Young, Associate Professor of Finance at the University of Bergamo, sheds light on everything that is not usually said about renewable energy, including the writing ' Other: < resterà nulla, mentre si dovranno smaltire milioni di pannelli obsoleti>>. And again: < anche alla riduzione nel costo dei pannelli, è dunque in atto una corsa a investire, da parte di numerosissimi soggetti, inclusi fondi esteri, attratti da rendimenti molto elevati e praticamente senza rischio. [...] Oggi tutti festeggiano, imprese, investitori, ministri ed ecologisti, mentre i consumatori sono ignari dell'onere che graverà su di loro in futuro. Ai francesi l'energia nucleare costa circa 35 euro per MWh, una buona centrale termica produce a 60 euro, il fotovoltaicone costa almeno 450: l'effetto sulla competitività del paese è dunque moltopesante, come pure l'onere sui consumatori che già oggi pagano tariffe assai più elevate della media europea>>.
Beyond the installation of the panels, at this very time-limited and low value added, the PV industry does not create new jobs (Italy produces almost no silicon panels) and supports the import of silicon cells to the detriment of the balance Italian commercial. I think that from a economic point of view there is little more to add. You act in a gold rush for the few at the expense of the country's economy and future of coming generations.
With regard to environmental and social discourse moves at a more complex, often providing escape routes for supporters of renewable energy, opposite to the figures that attest to a failure by the merciless economic point of view of "green energy". The ground covered by plants and crops stolen for decades under normal atmospheric conditions or hopelessly impoverished, while the expanse of solar panels provide an unedifying spectacle within the landscape.
From then consider that the disposal of the panels is a further threat to ambiente3 and an economic problem today unfortunately is undervalued, thus leaving other heavy legacy to future generations.
The solar PV is based on an obsolete technology, with little room for improvement because of the inherent limitations of the material. Currently the conversion efficiency varies between 8 and 20% depending on cell type and used to produce 1 kWp (in optimum conditions of radiation) are needed on average 10 square meters of silicon panels.
Recent studies have identified a physical limit of 29% for last
conversion efficiency, as saying that you will at best reduce half the surface of a panel to get the same energy. Needless to say then that the production of energy from the PV is highly uneven and tends to decrease with time (an estimated loss of around 1-2% per year in the efficiency of silicon cells).
Despite the obvious limitations of this technology, now in Italy there are 106,533
plants with an installed capacity of about 1737 MW7,
which involved a total use of soil (soil or other surfaces)
approximately 17,370,000 square meters,
a total expenditure of about 9 billion euro8 in practice as a financial maneuver
of the Italian State. Given the immense investment of these plants solari nel 2009 hanno prodotto 676 GWh, niente di meno che lo 0,9% di tutta l'energia prodotta in Italia! È chiaro a questo punto quale sia uno dei problemi più grandi e gravi delle energie rinnovabili: quello di distrarre fondi pubblici dalla ricerca vera di fonti energetiche alternative al petrolio, favorendo invece solo la speculazione di alcuni investitori a scapito della collettività.
Le Marche nel 2009 hanno consumato il doppio dell'energia prodotta (7981
GWh richiesti a fronte di una produzione di 4064 GWh prodotti: -50.9%)
confermandosi una delle regioni meno virtuose di Italia, è necessario
prendere provvedimenti e creare un vero piano energetico senza ideologie ed
interessi speculativi below.
For these reasons, I can only applaud the initiative of the Province of Ascoli Piceno to limit photovoltaic systems on the ground, hoping that just makes the whole local community, becoming aware of the progressive impoverishment of the area. In an era where it seems to prevail a cultural relativism that spans many areas, at least leave a little 'dignity of the numbers and the physical reality of the things that surround us.
Association President Dr. Andrea Pomozzi
PICENO TECHNOLOGIES
-----
0 comments:
Post a Comment