Ferdinando Adornato director of the Liberal Foundation, and eponymous bi-monthly published by it, decided to give life to what should be running for the newspaper Forza Italy. The name of the bimonthly / fondzione was already seeing his penalty in the Anglo-Saxon countries Liberal progressissiti are, well, seems to understand that the newspaper should be called with the same name (long live the original!).
said that I would do a couple of questions to experts:
Instead of founding a new newspaper would not be better to expand existing newspaper opinion as the Independent and opinion?
Newspapers party is in crisis, there is shown by the decrease of copies already for some time plagued the newspaper of the DS units (which I guess should be based on FI) and also the announcement of Fini wanted to transform the Century of Italy from the party in daily newspaper of ideas on the model of Il Foglio and Il Reform. In addition to
to get public funding (but FI was not a liberal party?) That anything else should have this operation?
The birth of this proportion, however, could bring the substantial indirect benefits, and now I will try to explain what and why.
few months ago, Angelo Crespi editor of The Sunday made a harsh criticism of the cdx emphasizing his inability to structure a serious cultural policy aimed to create that vital consensus for reforms, that consensus is necessary to induce the liberal revolution that the country would have a great need.
He pointed out for example that in front of an electorate broadly divided in half (actually more than is currently on the right and left) one could imagine a great newspaper liberal-conservative who could catch the reader disappointed by newspapers such as The Corsera (after the endorser of Honey continues to lose) and La Stampa.
Crespi made a speech looking back I it is even more true if you look at what is happening these days.
He wrote: "Given the hand, compared with about 5 million newspaper readers each day, are well sold 4 million copies of newspapers attributable to the left. Not wanting to believe that only the Italians left buy and read newspapers and reasoning about the composition of the electorate is easy to deduce that at least a couple million of these players are latamente center-right and that they could potentially buy newspapers from the center. Obviously to transmigrate from one head to another players must overcome psychological barriers and sedimented reading habits . Yet the space was (and is now increased! - Tudap). Sure
must imagine a great project . Find market substantial funding. Having a strong advertising sales (as with other Il Giornale Mondadori). Focusing primarily on the authority
so that we can offer a good reason for commitment to distinguished commentators who up to now have been willing to "dirty" to cooperate with the center-right newspapers. Find an editorial
inclusive that could take into account the social bloc crucial to Italy: that is, that block social conservative, Catholic, liberal, people who ruled together with more secular components and reform in our country for 50 years but now no longer a major newspaper in which to reflect.
Equip this newspaper all the right tools to compete with other products on the market (newsmagazine an attachment, an attachment of women, an allegation of economy and work, an annex of culture, a real website ... ).
And then, to make it short, would be enough to analyze the success of Republic (a newspaper born in the seventies and almost immediately able to compete with the Courier) and its ability to embody the views of its readers, to repeat the same right .
Why carry these words Crespi? simple, because the birth of a Designated Force Italy may give the possibility to free themselves from dependence The Journal of veiled it with Silvio Berlusconi (and his party) and to exploit its potential for transformation in The Republic of center .
E ', however, necessary to build on the advice of the Director of The Sunday maybe, I might add un'pò moderating. Which means, say the headlines from campaign stop, to avoid that way of partisan journalism that lead to blunders like the one on the Turkish who want euthanasia. Furthermore, if the newspaper wants to divest the role of party newspaper is almost good to call and able to write auotorevoli journalists (there are already ) and let the politicians and pundits to politicians (the Revolutionary Guzzanti but I would see it as good as the deputy director of Libero).
Who to call to manage this new journal? I would see us well Pierluigi Battista, currently deputy editor of Corriere, former columnist for La Stampa, was deputy editor of Panorama in Giuliano Ferrara.
0 comments:
Post a Comment